If i need additional features i can go with CXF? It was added in 1. If you need 1. I have a little doubt. In short. I hope it works for u too. Axis-2 and CXF come from Apache. Abhijit Patra Abhijit Patra 67 4 4 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook.
Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Podcast Explaining the semiconductor shortage, and how it might end. Does ES6 make JavaScript frameworks obsolete? Featured on Meta. Axis2 has taken an approach that makes it in many ways resemble an application server in miniature. Axis2 comes packaged with a WAR that can be deployed on a servlet container such as Tomcat that is designed to make web services easier to manage and deploy on the fly.
The Axis2 Web Administration module allows Axis2 to be configured dynamically while applications are running--new services can be uploaded, activated or deactivated and their parameters may be changed.
The administration UI also allows modules to be enabled on one or more running services. The only downside to using the UI for these purposes is the fact that configuration changes made through it are not persistent--they go away when the servlet container is restarted.
Axis2 lends itself towards web services that stand alone, independent of other applications, and offers a wide variety of functionality, and a good model for adding more functionality as time goes on through its modular architecture. Some developers may find that a little too cumbersome or heavy-duty for their needs.
These developers might prefer to look at Apache CXF. CXF concentrates on developer ergonomics and embeddability. CXF emphasizes code-first design, using simple APIs to make development of services from existing applications easier and its embeddability helps too. Whichever framework you choose, you'll have the benefit of an active and stable open source community.
Both have lively developer communities. Axis2 has been around longer but CXF is catching up quickly. My recommendation is this: If multilanguage support is important, Axis2 is the clear choice. If you care about an implementation focused on Java with tight integration into projects like Spring, CXF is a better choice, particularly for embedding web services inside of other programs. If the new features in these projects are not important, and you're relatively happy with Axis1, you should consider staying on this and keep up with the latest maintenance releases until you have a business reason to migrate.
Ok I answer again to my own question to share the solution. With the help of the guys from the CXF mailing list I found a solution that works for me.
There is actually 2 ways to solve the problem. Here is the explanation:. This solved the problem but I didn't want to have that link to the WSDL, so here is the second solution that gets rid of this link:. To get around this issue, You can simply copy jaxb-api. Note that "endorsing" means placing the relevant JAR files jaxb-api. Do not create the endorsed directory directly under the JDK's lib directory. If you use ant tasks, you can pass -Djava.
Axis2 supports each of these except for WS-Policy, which will be supported in an upcoming version. In comparing these frameworks, though, it's just as important to look at their approach to developing web services as it is to compare features.
From a developer perspective, both frameworks behave very differently from one another. Axis2 has taken an approach that makes it in many ways resemble an application server in miniature. Axis2 comes packaged with a WAR that can be deployed on a servlet container such as Tomcat that is designed to make web services easier to manage and deploy on the fly.
0コメント